TaxProf Weblog

Joshua Clean (UC-Irvine; Google Scholar) and Leigh Osofsky (North Carolina; Google Scholar) current The Inequity of Casual Steering, 75 Vand. L. Rev. __ (2022) (reviewed by Sloan Speck (Colorado; Google Scholar) right here), at UC-Irvine right now as a part of its Mental Life Workshop Collection:

The co-existence of formal and casual regulation is a trademark characteristic of the U.S. tax system. Congress and the Treasury enact formal regulation, comparable to statutes and laws, whereas the Inside Income Service provides the general public casual explanations and summaries, comparable to taxpayer publications, web site regularly requested questions, digital assistants, and different forms of taxpayer steerage. All through the COVID-19 pandemic, the IRS elevated its use of casual regulation to assist taxpayers perceive advanced emergency reduction guidelines carried out via the tax system.

In distinction to many different authorized students who’ve examined necessary administrative regulation points relating to casual tax steerage, on this Article, we reframe the subject as a social justice challenge. We argue that the 2 tiers of formal and casual regulation within the U.S. tax system systematically drawback taxpayers who lack entry to stylish advisors. This imbalance happens regardless of whether or not the IRS’s casual regulation accommodates statements that, if taxpayers adopted them, could be taxpayer favorable or unfavorable. When the steerage accommodates taxpayer-favorable positions, the IRS will not be legally sure by these positions and, throughout an audit, can contradict or ignore them. However when the steerage accommodates taxpayer-unfriendly positions, taxpayers who depend on them are sure to those interpretations as a sensible matter. Worse but, these taxpayers have nearly no safety towards tax penalties for incorrect positions that they declare primarily based on the IRS’s tax steerage. Against this, taxpayers who can entry and apply the formal sources of tax regulation, such because the Inside Income Code and Treasury laws, typically via attorneys, are in a considerably higher strategic place. They’ll depend on binding regulation, they will attempt to take essentially the most advantageous positions doable, and in the event that they meet a comparatively low bar of reasonableness, they may have penalty protections in doing so.

After highlighting the rising hole between formal and casual tax regulation, and the ensuing, systemic inequity it causes, we discover potential coverage approaches to handle it. We think about reforming the drafting of the formal tax regulation; altering the drafting of casual tax regulation to incorporate warnings to taxpayers and cross-references to formal tax regulation; revising the regulation relating to taxpayer reliance on casual tax regulation; and growing IRS analysis on how reliance on casual tax regulation varies primarily based on taxpayers’ revenue, submitting standing, race, and different private traits.

https://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2022/03/blank-presents-the-inequity-of-informal-guidance-today-at-uc-irvine.html