Introduction
“Software program is consuming the world.”
The enterprise capitalist Marc Andreessen wrote these phrases again in 2011. From at the moment’s perspective, with firms like Alphabet, Microsoft, and Meta dominating the inventory markets, Andreessen’s commentary appears to have held up.
Had BlackRock CEO Larry Fink made comparable feedback about exchange-traded funds (ETFs) 11 years in the past, he likewise would look prescient at the moment.
However regardless of its phenomenal development over the past decade, not all is nicely in ETF land.
ETF skeptics are rising louder, their criticisms extra pointed. Energetic managers — who’re completely unbiased, by the best way — imagine passive investing is distorting the inventory market. The effectivity of the capital markets might have elevated amid better integration of the worldwide economic system, they are saying, however now ETFs are skewing the pricing effectivity of single securities.
With these critiques in thoughts, what impact has passive investing, together with ETFs and mutual funds that observe indices, had on the US inventory market?
The Rise of ETFs
ETFs are essentially the most profitable monetary innovation of the final technology. As of 31 October 2021, greater than 8,000 ETFs handle near $10 trillion in international belongings, in line with ETFGI analysis. ETFs are usually not simply core funding merchandise for retail {and professional} buyers but in addition for central banks. For instance, the Financial institution of Japan has acquired majority possession of Japanese ETFs by way of its quantitative easing (QE) program, which might have been unimaginable a number of years in the past.
After all, there isn’t a free lunch within the markets. The ETF business’s success has come on the expense of actively managed mutual funds. Energetic funds have persistently misplaced market share to ETFs and listed mutual funds. The development is unlikely to gradual or reverse anytime quickly. The one query is what the final word ratio between energetic and passive will likely be. Standard estimates anticipate passive merchandise will seize a minimum of two-thirds of the market.
The Rise of ETFs: US Fairness Flows, in US Billions

US Inventory Possession
However fearmongering apart, passive merchandise are usually not taking up the entire funding world. They personal solely a fraction of the overall US inventory market. Mixed energetic and passive funds personal solely 28% of US shares as of 2020, up from 26% in 2010.
Pension funds, hedge funds, insurance coverage firms, household workplaces, and retail buyers are nonetheless the bulk homeowners of US shares. Their mixed market share — 72% — has barely budged over the past decade. Fund administration firms like BlackRock and Vanguard, which handle $10 trillion and $7.2 trillion, respectively, are usually not as omnipotent an affect as standard notion would have us imagine.
Passive Is Not Large: Proportion of US Inventory Market Capitalization

Inventory Buying and selling by ETFs
Most passive merchandise observe indices and so are likely to ignore company information. Energetic fund managers, then again, reply and react to those occasions, updating their valuation fashions accordingly. This ends in shopping for and promoting selections. If passive funds merely observe their index within the face of basic adjustments, ETF skeptics contend, aren’t they making fundamentals much less related and the markets much less environment friendly?
That is likely to be true if there have been just a few ETFs. However there are 1000’s and so they replicate the conduct of energetic managers. For instance, if an S&P 500 firm will increase its dividend, it received’t matter a lot for the ETFs monitoring the index. However it would matter for dividend yield-focused methods and can doubtless improve the demand for them. The response might solely happen when the index is rebalanced, however the level is obvious. Fundamentals matter for passive merchandise. As for energetic ETFs, which have grown standard, they pay as a lot consideration to the information as energetic mutual funds.
Critics additionally preserve that ETFs have begun to dominate buying and selling in US shares. But it surely’s essential to distinguish between major and secondary buying and selling. Most ETF exercise happens within the secondary market: The ETF merely adjustments arms, shifting from one shareholder to the following, with out affecting the underlying shares.
As a share of complete US inventory buying and selling, ETF secondary buying and selling has remained nearly fixed at 25% since 2011. This regardless of 1000’s of latest merchandise and trillions extra in belongings below administration (AUM).
ETF Secondary Buying and selling: Proportion of Whole US Inventory Buying and selling

What concerning the major market exercise that happens when ETF shares are created or redeemed by the related individuals? On this case, the underlying shares are purchased or offered, so there’s a direct market affect.
Once more, since 2011, as a share of complete US inventory buying and selling, ETF major market exercise has barely budged. ETFs account for an insignificant 5% of this buying and selling.
ETFs’ Share of Main US Inventory Market Exercise

ETFs’ Affect through Issue Investing
Past analyzing ETF buying and selling statistics, how else can we measure the ETF impact on the inventory market? Inventory correlation and dispersion are normal metrics, however they don’t reveal any constant developments within the decade since ETFs began to take off. Generally shares are extra correlated and fewer dispersed, however this appears cyclical quite than structural.
What about issue investing, which primarily displays investor conduct? Does that yield any perception? As passive merchandise seize better market share, index membership turns into extra essential. Shares exterior main indices just like the S&P 500 draw much less curiosity, which ought to result in reducing valuations and market capitalizations. Constructive and unfavourable suggestions loops ought to develop into stronger.
And certainly, if we have a look at the worth consider the USA, costly shares outperformed low-cost ones persistently since 2009. The dimensions issue did simply as poorly, as massive caps outperformed small caps.
Whereas it’s simple guilty the supposed demise of the worth and dimension components on the rise of passive investing, that may be untimely. In any case, between 1982 and 2000, an period of little or no passive investing, the dimensions issue generated unfavourable returns. Worth investing additionally skilled many years of poor efficiency over the past century.
US Worth and Measurement Issue Efficiency, Beta-Impartial, Lengthy–Brief

Additional Ideas
Though ETFs are nice instruments for buyers, their unique underlying goal has been corrupted.
“Energetic administration has failed. Simply purchase the index by way of an ETF.” That was the preliminary pitch for the ETF. And it labored — for a handful of ETFs that observe the S&P 500 and different main indices. However Wall Road is a gross sales machine and accordingly launched 1000’s of ETF merchandise. Buyers had been lured away from the ETF’s first and most useful use case. In any case, the optimum portfolio for many buyers is a bland one composed of a few inventory and bond indices.
At the moment, there are greater than 2,000 equity-focused ETFs in the USA and solely about 3,000 US shares. These ETFs cowl each possible technique and are nearly all energetic bets.
That is positively not what the ETF’s creators had supposed.
For extra insights from Nicolas Rabener and the FactorResearch workforce, join their e-mail publication.
If you happen to favored this submit, don’t neglect to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.
All posts are the opinion of the writer. As such, they shouldn’t be construed as funding recommendation, nor do the opinions expressed essentially replicate the views of CFA Institute or the writer’s employer.
Picture credit score: ©Getty Pictures / jorgelum
Skilled Studying for CFA Institute Members
CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report skilled studying (PL) credit earned, together with content material on Enterprising Investor. Members can report credit simply utilizing their on-line PL tracker.