Donor-advised funds (DAFs) are a novel kind of charitable giving car that require a specialised strategy to strategic asset allocation selections. At a fundamental stage, DAFs have to be open to limitless donors, every of whom can have distinctive charitable intentions, time horizons, and danger tolerances. Because of this, a sponsoring charity may have to supply a spectrum of asset allocation suggestions constructed for the varied targets and constraints of its donor base.
So what are the essential options of DAFs and what are the important elements to think about within the asset allocation resolution for a given donor? And what may some pattern donor eventualities appear to be?
Donor-Suggested Funds:
The Fundamentals
One key benefit DAFs supply donors is that the sponsoring group handles the funding together with its administrative and compliance duties and its related prices. That mentioned, whereas the donor retains advisory privileges and the sponsoring group will usually comply with donor requests, the donor does relinquish final management of the property. Because of this it’s particularly vital that sponsoring charities train accountable stewardship over these property.

Managing Funding Coverage: Components to Contemplate
When managing any particular person funding program, sure elements come into play when making selections round correct portfolio positioning. For DAFs, this requires making a spectrum of asset allocation suggestions constructed for a variety of various targets and constraints. The next chart illustrates what this spectrum of asset allocation choices may appear to be.
Donor Suggested Funds: Asset Allocation Choices

Beneath we define 5 key elements that could be vital to handle in the course of the asset allocation dialogue with a donor.
1. The Donor’s Intentions and Time Horizon
Understanding a donor’s intentions is the primary precedence. Particularly, is the donor planning to distribute all the funds instantly or over the close to time period? Do they intend for the fund to final for a number of years, a lifetime, or a number of generations?
The solutions to those questions are important, particularly as they relate to time horizons. All else being equal, the longer the time horizon, the larger the power to tackle danger. Why? As a result of the longer the time horizon, the higher the property can “journey out” short-term market volatility, which permits for increased fairness allocation.
For donors who intend to distribute everything of their fund inside just a few years, a portfolio with a much less dangerous asset allocation — with a excessive stage of shorter period, investment-grade fastened revenue, for instance — could be acceptable for them. On the opposite finish of the spectrum are donors who wish to develop their property over 20 years with out making any main distributions alongside the best way. For this cohort, a portfolio with a extra aggressive asset allocation, with, say, a heavy dose of public equities, may very well be a greater match. Donors who intend to make an annual distribution in perpetuity — let’s say 4% of the market worth of their portfolio every year — would seemingly fall someplace in the course of the spectrum. For them, a extra balanced allocation that goals to protect buying energy with room for modest development could be an excellent choice.
After all, framing these conversations with donors in the proper method may be among the many most vital inputs within the funding course of and might help instill confidence. Donors have to know that your group cares about their intentions and has the talents and data to assist them obtain their targets.
2. The Return Goal
The return goal needs to be based mostly on the donor’s intentions and time horizon: If the intention is for the fund to take care of a distribution in perpetuity whereas preserving buying energy, the chosen asset allocation will want to have the ability to obtain a minimal stage of return.
Conversely, if a donor plans to distribute the fund over the subsequent three years, the donor may need decrease return necessities and never want to select a portfolio with aggressive development targets and the upper volatility that usually comes with it.
There’s a variety of return targets doable — and the completely different portfolio choices typical to a given DAF present for these completely different targets. There isn’t any one-size-fits-all, however a donor’s intentions and time horizon might help them decide the proper return goal for his or her particular scenario.
3. Threat Tolerance
The donor’s aversion to danger needs to be gauged from each the target and subjective perspective. On an goal stage, the suitable quantity of danger relative to the donor’s return/distribution targets makes it extra seemingly that these targets shall be met. On a subjective stage, a donor’s private danger tolerance might help decided how they may reply if an account experiences outsized or sudden ranges of volatility. Will such outcomes bitter their outlook on the DAF as a charitable giving car?
Whereas figuring out danger tolerance could be equal elements artwork and science, together with danger tolerance within the portfolio choice course of might help to stability the target and subjective concerns related to figuring out the proper portfolio for a given donor. Particularly, danger tolerance helps with setting and managing expectations for the efficiency of the portfolio forward of time, and may be instrumental in measuring and defining success over time.
4. Liquidity
DAF distributions may be requested at any time, so liquidity is a crucial consideration with the funding of DAFs. Given the potential for an erratic frequency of distributions, we consider DAF swimming pools ought to solely be invested in liquid, readily marketable securities. Specifics round distribution wants can also issue into asset allocation selections given the necessity to stability staying absolutely invested with the power to liquidate investments for the money needed for distributions.
5. Distinctive Circumstances
Accountable investing property have grown remarkably during the last decade. Because of this, many DAFs have supplied accountable investing portfolio choices to their donors. A portfolio choice that requires investments display for environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards can be one iteration of this.
Accountable investing can enchantment to donors who need to align their funding portfolio with their private values or intentions. You will need to perceive what your donor base could be excited about and supply an acceptable funding portfolio choice or choices.
These 5 elements type a framework by which donors may be matched with a portfolio in step with their targets and constraints. So what are some pattern donor eventualities and the way may they map to completely different portfolio targets?
Pattern Donor
Eventualities
As we’ve mentioned, we really feel you will need to have a variety of portfolio choices accessible to match the widest vary of donor intentions and targets. As you may count on, these portfolios ought to run the gamut from conservative to aggressive and supply an affordable variety of funding swimming pools. Affordable means neither so few that donors can’t select one that matches their wants, nor so many who the administration of the DAF as a complete turns into troublesome or the swimming pools find yourself too small to make the most of economies of scale.
Within the desk under, we offer some examples as to how completely different donor time horizons and intentions may map to a given portfolio orientation. To make sure, these are solely examples and are supposed to be directional relatively than specific suggestions. The last word resolution is greatest made with a agency understanding of a given donor’s intentions and the precise portfolio swimming pools which are part of your DAF.
| Time Horizon | Donor Intention | Return Goal/ Threat Tolerance | Portfolio Orientation |
| 1–3 years | A donor want to give out cash instantly to handle a selected want, akin to supporting a meals financial institution throughout an financial downturn. | Low/Low | Conservative |
| 1–10 Years | A donor want to distribute the fund in annual installments to a charity over a set interval, akin to seven years. | Medium/Low | Balanced |
| Perpetuity | A donor and future generations want to have cash accessible to make periodic distributions to charity with no set frequency or distribution share. | Medium/Medium | Balanced |
| Donor’s Lifetime or Perpetuity | A donor want to make a charitable distribution of three.5% of the market worth of their fund, whereas preserving buying energy, in perpetuity. | Medium/Excessive | Development |
| 20-plus Years | A donor want to make a donation now and have it develop tax-free for 20 years earlier than making a donation to a nonprofit group of their alternative. | Excessive/Excessive | Aggressive |
Supply: PNC
Abstract
As a charitable giving car, the DAF can fulfill a variety of donor targets and constraints. Its reputation is due to this fact comprehensible. Having an funding coverage framework that may accommodate a spectrum of donor intentions might help donors reach assembly their targets and permit a sponsoring group to have an efficient and long-lasting charitable resolution for its donors.
If you happen to preferred this publish, don’t neglect to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.
All posts are the opinion of the writer. As such, they shouldn’t be construed as funding recommendation, nor do the opinions expressed essentially replicate the views of CFA Institute or the writer’s employer.
Picture credit score: ©Getty Pictures / Wokephoto17


